A ‘Legal Issues Seminar – General IP’ (LIS-GIP) was conducted by Shilpa Margaret Kurian, Associate, on “Can Over-The-Top Platforms Claim Immunity Under The Safe Habour Doctrine?”. The seminar explored the legal provisions that can be interpreted to determine whether an over-the-top (OTT) platform as a publisher can claim immunity under the safe habour doctrine. The session delved into the divergent views taken by courts on the issue. The session concluded with an interesting discussion on whether there is a requirement for an amendment to the existing framework to expressly deal with the liability of over-the-top platforms and whether OTT platforms have the same liability as social media platforms.

The presentation can be accessed here.

During last week’s Practice Work Shop (PWS) Session, Abhilasha Rathore, Associate, led a discussion on “Do TM Office’s opposition disposal drives effectively combat pendency?”. The session saw an informative discussion on the efficacy of special drives for reducing opposition backlog at the Indian Trademarks office. The session delved into the reasons behind the current opposition pendency and explored possible mechanisms to ascertain which matters should be taken up during such drives. The session concluded with some innovative suggestions on how these drives can be made more effective.

On the last day of June, ALG’s Attorneys got together for a virtual PRIDE party to celebrate Pride Month. The PRIDE party was an ode to the LGBTQIA+ community where the Attorneys played a fun game of ALLY (a cross between BINGO and PRIDE Trivia). During the game, the Attorneys discussed and acknowledged the community’s history, their struggles and their undeniably significant contribution to art, society and culture.

We continue to strive to showcase our support to the community as well as encourage inclusivity through our simple acts of recognition and allyship.

At ALG, we wish to foster safe environments that acknowledge the importance of equality, fairness, acceptance, and mutual respect.

A ‘Legal Issues Seminar – General IP’ (LIS-GIP) was conducted by Hardik Choudhary, Associate, on “Is a Website’s Content Relevant in Determining Identity or Confusing Similarity of a Domain Name?”. The seminar explored the concepts of rogue websites, cybersquatting and typosquatting in the context of a UDRP complaint. The session delved into the divergent views taken by panels on the issue and explored the extent to which the content of a website can be relevant in proving the identity or confusing similarity of a domain name. The session concluded with an interesting discussion on the relevancy of a website’s content for proving legitimate interest and bad faith.

The presentation can be accessed here.

During last week’s Practice Work Shop (PWS) Session, Sannidhi Mahapatra, Associate, led a discussion on “Does work from home model work well for IP law firms?”. The session saw an insightful discussion on whether the work-from-home model is more convenient for IP firms vis-a-vis other law firms. The session also delved into the advantages and disadvantages of working from home versus working from office. The session concluded with some intriguing ideas on whether law firms can permanently switch to the work from home model or would a hybrid system be more conducive for growth.