A ‘Legal Issues Seminar – General IP’ (LIS-GIP) was conducted by Shreya Kunwar, Associate, on ‘Is the Proof of Successful Trap Transactions Sufficient to Invoke the Jurisdiction of a Court?’. The seminar delved into the concept of “trap transactions” or “test orders” in IP disputes and the legitimacy of the same in invoking the jurisdiction of a court. In light of relevant judicial decisions, the discussion explored the various parameters that need to be satisfied before a successful trap transaction can be established before the court. The session concluded with an interesting discussion on the concepts of “purposeful availment” and the nature of commercial transactions for establishing the legitimacy of trap transactions.

The presentation can be accessed here.

During last week’s Practice Workshop (PWS) Session, Shilpa Margaret Kurian, Associate, led a discussion on “Would the Adoption of Data Analytics Tools Enhance the Functioning of IP Law Firms?”. The session saw an engaging discussion on data analytics and how these tools could benefit IP law firms with their business development. The session saw a debate on whether utilization of data analytics tools for generation of new business would be more beneficial than the traditional modes of business development. The session concluded with a discussion on whether having a separate data analytics team would be useful for the implementation of these tools in IP law firms.

Last Friday, ALG Attorneys got together online to welcome the newest additions to the team- Gazal Sancheti, Astha Gupta, Oshmi Jaiswal and Harshita Agarwal in an interactive Ice-breaker session. The Attorneys took a trip around the world in 60 minutes and put their brand knowledge to test in an engaging game that we called ‘Map That Brand’.

A ‘Legal Issues Seminar – General IP’ (LIS-GIP) was conducted by Shilpa Margaret Kurian, Associate, on “Can Domain Name Registrars Invoke Intermediary Liability Against Blanket Injunctions?”. The seminar delved into the concepts and definitions of domain name registrars (DNR), intermediary and intermediary liability. In light of relevant judicial pronouncements, the discussion explored whether a dynamic injunction can be granted against DNRs, and the scope and extent to which the DNRs can invoke the safe harbor principle. The session concluded with an interesting discussion on the current judicial trend and the nature of its impact on proprietors of registered and well-known marks.

The presentation can be accessed here.

During last week’s Practice Workshop (PWS) Session, Tanisha Agarwal, Associate, led a discussion on “Are Monetary Reliefs Useful in Case of Cultural Misappropriation?”. The session delved into the impact of cultural misappropriation on local communities and whether monetary relief is an adequate remedy. The session also witnessed an engaging discussion on whether grant of monetary reliefs would prevent brands from unauthorizedly copying a community’s cultural facets. The session concluded with a debate on who amongst the affected community should be granted the monetary relief.